View AbstractThe inception of Dogra rule in Kashmir in
1846 led to an unprecedented agrarian crisis in Kashmir,
as the peasantry in Kashmir was deprived from land
rights and was subjected to backbreaking taxation. It
was so because Maharaja Gulab Singh, the Maharaja of
the newly constituted Princely State, by virtue of the
Treaty of Amritsar, declared Kashmir valley his
purchased property. Considered as private property, the
Valley became a source of peculation and extraction to
the dynasty and the class of landlords attached to it.
Towards the 1880s, the British Government sought a
greater role in Kashmir. Accordingly, a British Residency
was established in Srinagar in 1885 and some reforms
were initiated during the reign of Maharaja Pratap
Singh. Perhaps, the most significant step was the
appointment of Sir Walter Lawrence as Settlement
Commissioner to have a fair settlement of the land
revenue system. The settlement was completed in 1889
and the report was submitted to the Maharaja for its
implimentaion. Despite the limited implementation of
this settlement, it led to positive developments like the
grant of occupancy rights for peasants, revenue
collection in cash, and some curtailment of taxes.
Additional reforms were carried out after the
recommendations of the Glancy Commission (1931-1932),
like the grant of propriety rights over Khalsa (state
managed) land. However, the feudal exploitative system
continued, and as compared to British India, agriculture
remained extremely backward. It was only after 1947 that
satisfactory land reforms were carried out, when the
Nationalist government implemented its progressive
programme of land to the tiller and abolished feudalism.
Therefore, the present paper identifies the three main
stages in the history of land relations i.e 1846-1894, 1895-
1933, and 1934-1953. Exploring these stages, the paper
describes the nature and the character of the land
reforms undertaken during the colonial and post-
Kashmir Towards Golden Harvests | 105
colonial period. Based on this trajectory, the paper also
explains the prospects and limitations of these reforms,
and presents a critical understanding of the overall
impact of such reform on rural Kashmir.